I listen to the gods of cruising! Bill, your's are words of wisdom. Mine are
of a has-been. My evaluation of the boom furler took place several years ago
when the unit was still built by its NZ designer. It required electrical
force to both raise and lower the mainsail. I did not go back and try the
"improved" version now manufactured by Forespar. I did instead choose their
in-mast furler after having a good experience with it when it was still
popular. Had I to choose today, I think my selection would likely follow
that of Amadon Light's. You don't get more expert than these two! Friction
on the luff is a major problem apparently solved with a boost from the
Teflon insert. A major difference between the two systems is that the
halyard on the in-mast is used once or twice a season while the in-boom is
used nearly constantly. Care must be taken to insure the halyards and
masthead sheaves are inspected frequently. Another unsung benefit from the
in-boom furler is its abilities as a rain catcher. In both installations, my
favorite boon is not having to deal with the most onerous task ever on a
boat-putting on or removing the mainsail cover!

Listen to Bill.

Tom
MOONSHADOW

-----------------------------------------------------------
Baba Panda and Tashiba Owners Mailing List --
For more info, please check out the FAQ...
http://www.ballreich.net/hypermail/baba-l/faq.html
Received on Thu Oct 12 08:54:38 2006